High Peak Liberal DemocratsFrom much of the letters and correspondence received, plus their own training manual, it is clear that Atos Assessment is based purely on ' if ' you can work.
Their reasoning is based on a narrow field of vision - can they work YES or NO;
The follow on question ' can they sustain that work ' ? doesn't apply. This is the problem that seems to crop up every time, and its the one that is only answered by the appeals tribunals, this is why many result in success.
So the system manual being used by Atos at the moment is flawed.It is so contrived that even those using it seem to fail to put in a truly accurate report. Even if many sick and disabled were found jobs, their sustainability would be severely limited. Most employers would be reluctant to take on anyone who could be a danger to others or themselves. With H&S a key factor.So what is the answer?
We seem to have become a nation obsessed with Privatising everything with the hope that it will all be better. Just as we Nationalised everything thinking it will all be better!
Neither seems to be the answer.. so what is? I don't know, but maybe a sensible combination of the two would work?
What do you think?
Printed (hosted) by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY
Published and promoted by Barrie Taylor on behalf of High Peak Liberal Democrats all at Daleside, Linglongs Road,, Whaley Bridge SK23 7DS and by Richard Salmon, Derbyshire Liberal Democrats on behalf of Stan Heptinstall (Liberal Democrats) both at 9 Walnut Road, Belper DE56 1RG.
The views expressed are those of the publisher, not of the service provider.
Website designed and developed by Prater Raines Ltd, with modifications by High Peak Liberal Democrats