Top of page.

High Peak Liberal Democrats

Navigation.
Content.

Monitoring the removal of the spare room subsidy

September 13, 2013 3:54 PM
By Lord German in Liberal Democrat Voice
Originally published by East Midlands Liberal Democrats

Like many people reading the front page of the Guardian yesterday morning, I was worried by the headline on the pronouncements by the UN special rapporteur on the removal of the spare room subsidy. But it is important to look behind the headline to see that these comments were based on a very brief visit from this adviser, who did not have the time for a detailed discussion with the Department for Work and Pensions to understand the policy. If she had done she would have been able to understand that this policy brings the rules for the social housing sector into line with those which Labour already introduced for private rented accommodation. Perhaps then she may have recognised that the policy is designed to tackle long council waiting lists and help those families stuck in overcrowded one bedroom flats - to find somewhere decent to live.

Most importantly, the rapporteur ignored the achievements of the Lib Dems in the coalition in arguing for extra Discretionary Housing Payments to ensure vulnerable people do not have to face extra costs. Because everyone's situation is so different it is right that we have given local councils control over how this funding is best spent. We have also successfully argued for exemptions for groups such as foster carers. Finally, we have ensured that local authorities in particular need, can bid for extra funding over the course of this year. I will also be making sure that the Coalition sticks to its promise of monitoring the impact of this policy carefully over the coming months.

Read more by or more about , , or

John Wheaver - Kettering and Wellingborough comments

More serious thought would have prevented the bedroom tax being bundled in a crazy hurry. Like twenty seconds thought instead of five. I am ashamed of any liberal whose false loyalty to a crack-pot Tory initiative overruled his intelligence and decency. The appalling effects were entirely predictable. The attacks on the UN representative were disgraceful.

The arguments presented about the unfairness of subsidising an unnecessary bedroom are totally logical and reasonable - but they stupidly miss, or dishonestly evade, the point. That is that removing the subsidy suddenly will obviously and inevitably cause hardship.

It is as if a perfect argument that someone should not be housed on the fourth floor concludes that they should jump out of the window. The subsidy should have been removed after five years - much less than that and the removal is a tax if not a penalty.

The Lib Dems in Government are too keen to support penalising the poorest victims of the recession in order to support the under-taxed wealthy, including (deliberately it seems) those who irresponsibly caused it.

No the Labour Party did not cause the recession (or even the defecit, which is of course quite different) - few Tories really believe that.