High Peak Liberal DemocratsAn important new Upper Tribunal judgment has clarified the legal framework for deciding whether a Personal Independence Payment (PIP) award should be an indefinite award or for a fixed term. The judgment can be used by those disabled people who feel that they should be made an indefinite award of PIP as their daily living and/or mobility problems are unlikely to diminish. It can also be used by those disabled people who feel that they should have been made a longer fixed term PIP award again because their daily living and/or mobility problems are likely be more long standing. In UK/5459/2014, Upper Tribunal Judge Mitchell holds that the Welfare Reform Act 2012 provides a qualified requirement that PIP awards are to be for a fixed term. The statutory qualification to the requirement for fixed term awards is that a fixed term award would be "inappropriate". In deciding whether a fixed term would be inappropriate, a key consideration is the likely persistence of an individual's limiting conditions. A factor in favour of concluding a fixed term award would be inappropriate is the relative ease with which the DWP may re-open the question of a PIP recipient's entitlement even if s/he has an indefinite award. Judge Mitchell further holds that: if a fixed term award would be inappropriate, an indefinite award is to be made; a First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a decision not to make an indefinite award; and if the Secretary of State issues guidance about deciding whether a fixed term award would be inappropriate, while a First-tier Tribunal is required to have regard to the guidance it must not be treated as if it were a rule. In fixing the duration of a fixed term award, relevant considerations will include the likely persistence of an individual's limiting conditions and the relative ease with which PIP entitlement may be re-opened before the end of the fixed term. Generally, the likely persistence of limiting conditions and duration of a fixed term award are positively related. In addition, Judge Mitchell finds that: rigid categories for the duration of fixed term awards are not compatible with the purpose of the 2012 Act; and a First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a decision as to the duration of a fixed term award. This decision also clarifies that DLA to PIP transfer awards have effect from a date determined by reference to the Secretary of State's entitlement decision, not the date of the transfer claim. - See more at: http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2016/march/decisions-not-award-pip-indefinitely-or-longer-period-can-be-appealed#sthash.5Dz6E2QK.dpuf
Printed (hosted) by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY
Published and promoted by Barrie Taylor on behalf of High Peak Liberal Democrats all at Daleside, Linglongs Road,, Whaley Bridge SK23 7DS and by Richard Salmon, Derbyshire Liberal Democrats on behalf of Stan Heptinstall (Liberal Democrats) both at 9 Walnut Road, Belper DE56 1RG.
The views expressed are those of the publisher, not of the service provider.
Website designed and developed by Prater Raines Ltd, with modifications by High Peak Liberal Democrats